Radio
Now Playing
Quickyla Radio โ€” Click to play
Open โ†’
3 min left

Study says San rock art depicts elephants, not dinosaurs

New research reveals that San rock art figures previously identified as dinosaurs are actually stylized elephants or antelopes. This correction highlights the dangers of over-interpreting symbolic arโ€ฆ

The monsters that weren't: Dinosaur and tusked-beast claims in San rock art unravel
Phys.org โ€” 19 September 2026
Text:
28 0 0

For decades, paleontologists have claimed that the San and Basotho peoples of southern Africa once depicted dinosaurs and tusked beasts in their rock art, a theory that has now been challenged by new research. The claim first appeared in a 2016 paper that argued that certain cave paintings in Namibia and Lesotho showed large reptiles with long tails and thick necks, supposedly evidence that Indigenous peoples witnessed dinosaur remains.

The idea gained traction because it promised to link oral traditions with the fossil record and to show that prehistoric humans had a broader understanding of the natural world. Researchers pointed to songs and myths that described โ€œgiant beastsโ€ and to the sheer size of some rock images, suggesting that the artists were drawing creatures that lived millions of years before humans. The theory also fed into popular narratives that Indigenous knowledge holds untapped scientific secrets.

Recent analysis, however, has called the interpretations into question. A 2024 study using highโ€‘resolution imaging and comparative iconography found that the figures previously identified as dinosaurs are more plausibly stylised representations of large mammals such as elephants or antelopes. The researchers noted that the proportions, posture, and contextual cluesโ€”such as the presence of domesticated cattle and human figuresโ€”do not match dinosaur anatomy. While some scholars defend the original readings, citing the persistence of certain motifs across regions, most experts now agree that the evidence for dinosaur depictions is weak.

The reassessment has implications beyond a single set of cave paintings. It underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between archaeologists, anthropologists, and paleontologists to avoid overโ€‘interpretation of symbolic art. Future projects will focus on systematic surveys of rock art sites and on engaging Indigenous communities to understand the cultural meanings behind the images. The debate reminds the scientific community that even longโ€‘standing theories can be overturned when new data and fresh perspectives are applied.

Read Full Story at Phys.org โ†’
Advertisement
React:
Sources
Sponsored

More to Read

Finding meaning in the impossible
๐Ÿ”ฌ Science
Finding meaning in the impossible
Scientific American ยท 14 days ago
Are you worried about the US deploying weapons in space?
๐Ÿ”ฌ Science
Are you worried about the US deploying weapons in space?
Live Science ยท 14 days ago
South American 'Pompeii': Volcanic eruption 22 million yearโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ”ฌ Science
South American 'Pompeii': Volcanic eruption 22 million years ago preserved a snapshot of โ€ฆ
Live Science ยท 15 days ago
Giant caves beneath sinkhole reveal origin of mystery trencโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ”ฌ Science
Giant caves beneath sinkhole reveal origin of mystery trenches that score Australia's Nulโ€ฆ
Live Science ยท 7 days ago
Mortgage and refinance interest rates today, Wednesday, Sepโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ“ˆ Markets & Finance
Mortgage and refinance interest rates today, Wednesday, September 16, 2026: Rates ease soโ€ฆ
Yahoo Finance ยท 13 days ago
Aztec manuscript returns to Mexico after two centuries, on โ€ฆ
๐ŸŒ World News
Aztec manuscript returns to Mexico after two centuries, on loan
DW World ยท 11 days ago
Full view