Radio
Now Playing
Quickyla Radio โ€” Click to play
Open โ†’
3 min left
Back to News

Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell sue Anthropic over copyright infringement

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell are suing Anthropic for allegedly using copyrighted works in its AI models without authorization, seeking up to $150,000 per infringed work. This lawsuit couโ€ฆ

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell are suing Anthropic
The Verge โ€” 29 August 2026
Text:
16 0 0

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The music giants are seeking damages for "tens of thousands" of copyrighted works, asking for up to $150,000 per infringed work, along with an additional $25,000 for each instance where identifiable copyright data was removed.

This legal action comes amid growing concerns over how artificial intelligence models utilize copyrighted materials without proper authorization. Anthropic, an AI research company, has been developing advanced language models that may have been trained on copyrighted texts. The lawsuit suggests that major music publishers are increasingly vigilant about protecting their intellectual property in an era where AI technologies are rapidly evolving and often operate in legal gray areas.

In their complaint, Sony and Warner Chappell assert that Anthropic's practices not only violate copyright laws but also threaten the livelihoods of songwriters and artists who rely on royalties from their works. The total damages sought could reach into the millions, reflecting the scale of the alleged infringements. The case underscores a broader industry shift, where traditional content creators are pushing back against tech companies that use their work to train AI systems, often without consent or compensation.

The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the future of both the music and technology industries. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it may set a precedent that requires AI companies to seek licenses for copyrighted materials used in training their models. This could lead to more stringent regulations around AI development and a clearer framework for how creative works are protected in the digital age. As the case unfolds, it will be closely watched by both copyright holders and tech innovators, as it highlights the ongoing tension between creativity and technological advancement.

Read Full Story at The Verge โ†’
Advertisement
React:
Sources
Sponsored

More to Read

Australia's eSafety regulator criticizes Roblox for child sโ€ฆ
๐Ÿš” Crime & Justice
Australia's eSafety regulator criticizes Roblox for child safety failures
The Verge ยท 13 days ago
Migrant women report sexual harassment in Ceuta's overcrowdโ€ฆ
๐Ÿš” Crime & Justice
Migrant women report sexual harassment in Ceuta's overcrowded camps
France 24 ยท 14 days ago
Lockerbie bombing trial of Abu Agila Mas'ud delayed until Jโ€ฆ
๐Ÿš” Crime & Justice
Lockerbie bombing trial of Abu Agila Mas'ud delayed until January 2024
BBC World News ยท 9 days ago
Whistleblower Arturo Bรฉjar leads testimony in landmark triaโ€ฆ
๐ŸŒ World News
Whistleblower Arturo Bรฉjar leads testimony in landmark trial against Meta
NPR News ยท 14 days ago
Nigeria's jet fuel conundrum: Scarcity at home, abundance aโ€ฆ
๐ŸŒ World News
Nigeria's jet fuel conundrum: Scarcity at home, abundance abroad
DW World ยท 9 days ago
Is Sudanโ€™s battlefield shaping the terms of its next politiโ€ฆ
๐ŸŒ World News
Is Sudanโ€™s battlefield shaping the terms of its next political phase?
Al Jazeera ยท 8 days ago
Full view