Radio
Now Playing
Quickyla Radio โ€” Click to play
Open โ†’
3 min left

Senate panel votes to hold Fauci in contempt

The Senate panel will vote on holding Anthony Fauci in contempt after he invoked the Fifth Amendment over 100 times. This escalation tests congressional oversight power and sets a precedent for handlโ€ฆ

Senate panel to vote on Fauci contempt resolution after tense hearing
The Hill โ€” 4 August 2026
Text:
17 0 0

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will vote Thursday morning on a resolution that could hold former National Institutes of Health director Anthonyโ€ฏFauci in contempt of Congress. The vote follows a hearing last week in which Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right to avoid selfโ€‘incrimination more than 100 times and refused to answer any of the committeeโ€™s questions. The resolution would force Fauci to comply with a subpoena, and could lead to fines or even jail time if he fails to obey.

The hearing was part of a broader congressional push to examine the federal response to the COVIDโ€‘19 pandemic. Republicans led the questioning, focusing on Fauciโ€™s role in vaccine approval, data sharing, and the handling of the virusโ€™s spread. Fauciโ€™s refusal to answer was framed as a legal right, but critics say it obstructed oversight. The committeeโ€™s move to pursue contempt is an escalation, signaling that lawmakers will not accept silence from highโ€‘profile witnesses.

If the resolution passes, Fauci would be required to testify or face civil or criminal contempt proceedings. Republicans argue that enforcing the subpoena is essential to hold public officials accountable. Fauciโ€™s legal team has said the former director would comply if the subpoena were served, but they also warn that the resolution could be challenged in court. Democrats contend that the action is politically motivated and that Fauciโ€™s testimony was already protected by the Fifth Amendment. The vote is expected to be close, with most committee members favoring the resolution.

A passed resolution would set a precedent for how Congress handles future witnesses who refuse to answer. It could also influence the political narrative around COVIDโ€‘19 policy and the legacy of Fauciโ€™s leadership. The outcome will be watched closely by both sides of the aisle, as it reflects the ongoing partisan battle over accountability and the interpretation of constitutional rights in the context of congressional investigations.

Read Full Story at The Hill โ†’
Advertisement
React:
Sources
Sponsored

More to Read

Panetta on Iran war: US โ€˜in deep troubleโ€™
๐Ÿ›๏ธ Politics
Panetta on Iran war: US โ€˜in deep troubleโ€™
The Hill ยท 13 days ago
USDA: Food supply is safe despite cyclospora, screwworm figโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ›๏ธ Politics
USDA: Food supply is safe despite cyclospora, screwworm fights
The Hill ยท 13 days ago
Trump administration wonโ€™t intervene in Tate brothers extraโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ›๏ธ Politics
Trump administration wonโ€™t intervene in Tate brothers extradition: White House
The Hill ยท 14 days ago
Why Tesla Stock Crashed Today
๐Ÿ“ˆ Markets & Finance
Why Tesla Stock Crashed Today
Nasdaq News ยท 13 days ago
Hereโ€™s the biggest news you missed this weekend
๐ŸŒ World News
Hereโ€™s the biggest news you missed this weekend
NBC News ยท 11 days ago
Singapore Stock Market Tipped To Open In The Red
โš”๏ธ War & Conflict
Singapore Stock Market Tipped To Open In The Red
Nasdaq News ยท 13 days ago
Full view